Anyhow, more about the patent itself, according to the article.
Verizon filed the patent application on Sept. 2, 2011 (another demonstration of potential time costs incurred, which we have probably seen so many times already), but it was published last month (March, 2013). In the filing, Verizon details a mobile surveillance system, which includes wearable wireless devices, designed to transmit data wirelessly about a dangerous event happening to the user of the system or to send that user an alert about some kind of emergency event. Essentially, "one or more discrete user-wearable devices" could capture still images and video about what is going on around the user, and then send that data out.
Sounds smart and useful, but will we see it as a product soon? Nobody knows. The filing does not indicate whether the technology has been commercialized or for what market it might be used. According to the reporter, Verizon does a great deal of work with law enforcement agencies and so it may be designed for them and not for consumers.
I definitely share the same sentiment in that technology is moving much faster than the legal system. I'd hope that if there was an egregious violation of privacy, the legal framework would pick up the pace to address it, but in terms of this technology, it's a toss up in my opinion. I guess we will only see how it is used in the future.
ReplyDeleteI could see Verizon coming under a huge amount of criticism for the use of this patented system. The patent itself is just a description of the process but I agree that it could lead to some big issues if the company fails to implement it in an ethical way.
ReplyDeleteI think in this age of transparency, privacy will become more and more of an issue, especially to those who have no grown up with this type of unprecedented tracking technology. Just like the Target case, where Target predicted a pregnancy before the father of the pregnant girl knew about it, these technologies bring incredible detailed personal information to companies in order to cater their sales to the consumer. I think overall, more openness will be a good thing, although there will always been extreme examples. If anything, I hope that patents and privacy issues do not get in the way of innovation, though there is definitely a balance to be struck.
ReplyDelete